The Elevator Information Gap (and How to Close It): Best Practices for Elevator Service Contracts
- ClearLift
- Nov 20, 2025
- 4 min read
In the elevator world, the biggest difference between smooth, predictable service and frustrating, expensive service often comes down to a single factor:
How clear the information is.
Good elevator companies know this. They build their contracts around transparency, clear scopes, and real accountability. When you work with one, you feel it immediately:
The contract says what it means.
The technician explains issues in plain language.
Costs are predictable.
Emergencies are actually emergencies.
And you never feel blindsided.
A quick word in defense of good vendors:
It’s important to say this out loud: elevator companies have to make money.
They’re carrying real costs:
Highly trained technicians
24/7 response capability
Insurance, vehicles, and tools
Parts inventory and supply risk
If the pricing model doesn’t account for those realities, service quality falls apart, and nobody wins.
The problem isn’t that vendors charge for what they do. The problem is how some contracts are structured and how information is used (or withheld) to justify decisions and pricing.
Most vendors are trying to do the right thing. This article is about spotting the ones who aren’t.
Where the Information Gap Comes From
1. Vague contracts vs. clear contracts
Good vendors write contracts that spell out exactly what’s covered, what isn’t, and how decisions will be made.
Bad contracts, on the other hand, hide the essentials in broad, flexible terms:
“Full maintenance” that excludes half the system
Callback coverage that depends on interpretation
“Major repairs excluded” with no definition
Vagueness becomes a revenue stream.
2. Straightforward explanations vs. proprietary jargon
Good vendors explain faults plainly: “Your door motor is overheating. Here’s the data.” - "This bearing is shot, listen to this."
Others bury simple issues in intimidating technical language:
“Controller degradation”
“Obsolescence alert”
“Operational instability event”
Jargon isn’t always wrong, but when it replaces clarity, it’s a red flag.
3. Honest repair paths vs. the “replacement spiral”
Good vendors exhaust reasonable repair options before recommending modernization.
Others use the infamous move:
“That part is obsolete - you need a full upgrade.”
Sometimes that’s true. Often it’s not.
Parts that are supposedly “unavailable” frequently exist through:
third-party distributors
aftermarket suppliers
reputable rebuilders
Modernizations should be strategic, not default.
4. Competitive environments vs. one-bid complacency
Good companies welcome competitive comparisons. They know that when scopes are clear and pricing reflects real work, they’ll be in the mix.
But in many buildings, owners only call their existing vendor. Without competitive pressure, pricing drifts toward whatever number will be tolerated instead of what the work actually costs.
A one-bid environment almost guarantees you’re paying more than you should, even with a decent company.
How Bad Actors Exploit the Gap
Here are the behaviors we see repeatedly in problematic contracts:
Overstated urgency to push quick decisions
Inflated repair proposals that magically shrink when competition appears
“Obsolete” parts that mysteriously reappear when another vendor gets involved
Bundled upgrades hiding unnecessary work
Long, restrictive contracts that trap buildings into dependency
When you can’t validate the information, everything becomes a crisis, and every crisis becomes an opportunity.
How Property Owners Can Level the Playing Field
You don’t need to become an elevator mechanic. You just need the tools to challenge assumptions and verify what you’re told.
Here’s how:
1. Get a second opinion every time
A reputable vendor won’t flinch at comparison. A shaky one will. Even if you don't have time for a full-fledged bid, a quick call to ClearLift can give you the confidence you need.
2. Ask for the data, not the headline
If you hear:
“Your door operator is failing.”
Ask:
What fault codes are you seeing?
How often is it happening?
Which component is failing?
Can you show me?
Truth is easy to demonstrate. Confusion is easy to hide behind.
3. Verify part availability
The word “obsolete” should trigger investigation, not a signature.
Many “unavailable” parts are still very much available.
4. Always get multiple repair quotes
One quote gives you a number. Three quotes give you a picture.
This is exactly why ClearLift exists: competition creates clarity.
5. Demand clear scopes
A legitimate proposal includes:
what will be done
what won’t be done
timelines
labor + material breakdowns
alignment between verbal and written explanations
If a scope feels vague, it could be intentional.
6. Know when modernization actually makes sense
Legitimate reasons include:
repeated failures after documented repair attempts
code or safety requirements that can’t be met otherwise
parts truly unavailable from any source
equipment that has reached a natural end of life
Everything else deserves scrutiny.
The Bottom Line: Fair Profit, Clear Information
Most property owners want one thing: reliable, fairly priced elevator service from a vendor that will be there when it counts.
Most elevator companies want to:
pay their people well
stay profitable
deliver good service
keep long-term customers
Those goals are completely compatible as long as the information is clear and the contract is honest.
The deck only gets stacked when confusion becomes part of the business model.
That’s why transparency isn’t a luxury; it’s a safeguard.
At ClearLift, our role is simple: We remove the fog.
We translate the jargon, solicit competitive bids from trustworthy independent providers, and give property owners the clarity they need to make confident decisions.
When information becomes transparent, bad actors lose their advantage, and good contractors can earn a fair profit by doing things the right way.
You can download this 7-point checklist (with red and green flags for reference) to make your next decision a clear, informed decision:
Comments